The resurrection of RedKit: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
m 1 revision imported |
||
(No difference)
| |||
Revision as of 14:30, 7 February 2015
(Publication) Google search: [1]
| The resurrection of RedKit | |
|---|---|
| Botnet | |
| Malware | |
| Botnet/malware group | |
| Exploit kits | RedKit |
| Services | |
| Feature | |
| Distribution vector | |
| Target | |
| Origin | |
| Campaign | |
| Operation/Working group | |
| Vulnerability | |
| CCProtocol | |
| Date | 2014 / 2014-01-07 |
| Editor/Conference | Kahu Security |
| Link | http://www.kahusecurity.com/2014/the-resurrection-of-redkit/ www.kahusecurity.com (www.kahusecurity.com Archive copy) |
| Author | Darryl |
| Type | Blogpost |
Abstract
“ “RedKit” was once a thriving exploit pack then faded away leaving behind artifacts on several abandoned hosts which are still triggering broken redirection alerts to this day. Within the past couple of months, however, we are witnessing a deliberate return of “RedKit”. While I can’t be 100% certain, there are many striking similarities between this and the previous iteration of RedKit that I’m led to believe that this is an updated version.
Bibtex
@misc{Darryl2014BFR1372,
editor = {Kahu Security},
author = {Darryl},
title = {The resurrection of RedKit},
date = {07},
month = Jan,
year = {2014},
howpublished = {\url{http://www.kahusecurity.com/2014/the-resurrection-of-redkit/ www.kahusecurity.com}},
}